Empower your team with intelligent route planning, real-time tracking, and seamless communication tools.
May 30, 2026 (2mo ago) — last updated July 31, 2026 (11d ago)
Route-ready, field-first battle cards that protect revenue and accelerate deals with OnRoute.
← Back to blog
In the field, reps have minutes, not hours, to respond to a competitor’s claim. They don’t need a bloated PDF in a CRM; they need the right reply, fast, on the route they’re already running. This guide shows how to craft, distribute, and use route-ready battle cards that protect revenue and accelerate deals—with OnRoute as the field execution tool.
In the field, reps have minutes, not hours, to respond to a competitor’s claim. They don’t need a bloated PDF in a CRM; they need the right reply, fast, on the route they’re already running. This guide shows how to craft, distribute, and use route-ready battle cards that protect revenue and accelerate deals—with OnRoute as the field execution tool.
Battle cards should help reps win live conversations under pressure. Too many teams publish them as internal documentation, then wonder why field reps ignore them. If a card is hard to find, too long to scan, or written for a product marketer instead of a seller in the field, it won’t get used. And unused battle cards do not protect revenue. 1
Good teams follow the usual guidance: keep cards short, keep them consistent, update them often. But storing them in a wiki or sales portal is not enough for field sales. Outside reps work between stops, in trucks, in parking lots, and right before they walk into customer sites. Put competitive guidance where they can use it, at the point of action, with a field execution tool like OnRoute. 2
Presentation still matters. If you want those field assets to look polished without dragging sales leaders into design cleanup, on-demand graphic design for businesses is a practical option. Clean design will not fix weak messaging, but cluttered cards get ignored fast.
The teams that win competitive deals don’t collect more data. They collect the right intelligence, then force it into a format reps can readily use. That starts with brutal honesty.
Most competitive input is garbage because it comes in late and full of excuses. “They had a better relationship.” “Procurement pushed us out.” “The buyer wanted cheaper.” Maybe. Maybe your rep also had no clue how to handle the competitor’s positioning.
Run win-loss reviews with discipline. Ask the rep what claim the buyer repeated, what proof the competitor used, what objection landed hardest, and where the conversation shifted. Strip out opinion fast.
You need answers to questions like these:
One useful competitive framework formalizes battle cards around a winning zone, losing zone, and battling zone, then structures the card with an overview, the zone analysis, and strategy or tactics. I like it because it forces leadership teams to stop pretending they win everywhere. 2
| Zone | What it means | What reps should do |
|---|---|---|
| Winning zone | Situations where your fit is strong and your value is clear | Lean in early. Make this the center of discovery and demo flow. |
| Losing zone | Conditions where the competitor has structural advantage | Don’t bluff. Reframe, narrow scope, or disqualify fast. |
| Battling zone | The contested ground where both vendors can plausibly win | Arm reps with proof, objection handling, and landmine questions. |
Practical rule: If leadership can’t name the losing zone, your battle card program is built on fantasy.
Often, many teams become complacent. They make one one-pager per competitor and call it done. That’s not enough.
Applied Frameworks makes the point directly. Competitive analysis should be specific to buyer type or segment because capability importance changes by audience. Yet most templates still default to one generic comparison sheet. That’s a major miss for field teams.
A dispatcher might care about visibility, speed of updates, and team coordination. A territory manager may care about route efficiency and rep accountability. An operations leader will push on compliance, documentation, and consistency. If your rep opens the same battle card for all three, you’ve already made their job harder.
Use a simple intelligence intake model:
One more useful input. If you sell into contractor-heavy industries or local service markets, technical clues on competitor websites can reveal stack choices, forms, schedulers, and tracking tools. This guide to competitor website tech for contractors is a practical way to sharpen that external research.
Your rep is sitting in the truck outside the next stop. The buyer mentioned a competitor in the last email. The rep has two minutes to prepare. If the card reads like product marketing homework, the deal is already harder than it should be.
Build cards for speed, pressure, and real conversations. A field rep should grasp the angle fast, use it in plain language, and move the deal forward without scrolling through filler. If the card needs six sections, legal disclaimers, and a feature matrix nobody can say out loud, scrap it and start over.
A good card fits on one mobile screen, or two at most. That matters even more if your team uses a mobile app for sales reps, where the rep needs the right line before walking into the account, not after digging through a CRM folder.
| Field Name | Content |
|---|---|
| Competitor snapshot | One tight summary. Who they target, where they win, and why buyers consider them. |
| Quick dismiss | A short response for early mentions of the competitor, before the rep gets pulled into a bad comparison. |
| Why we win | The few points your team should repeat every time. Tie them to buyer pain, risk, and operational impact. |
| Their strengths and our counter | Say where they are strong. Then give the rep the exact counterpoint that keeps control of the discussion. |
| Pressure points | The claims, gaps, and tradeoffs that actually swing deals. Put your sharpest talk tracks here. |
| Landmine questions | Questions that expose weak fit, hidden costs, rollout friction, or support problems. |
| Pricing traps | Guidance on discounting games, packaging confusion, implementation gaps, and missing services. |
| Proof points | Approved stories, customer evidence, third-party validation, or even short content formats like personalized video to make a claim more credible. |
| Red flags | Signals the competitor is already shaping the deal, or that the buyer is drifting toward a bad evaluation path. |
| Next move | The exact action the rep should take next. Ask a question, send proof, change the frame, pull in support, or reset scope. |
Most battle card programs falter. Not at creation. At delivery.
A shared drive is too slow. A wiki is too passive. A CRM attachment sounds useful until a rep is in a parking lot with two minutes before a meeting and weak signal. If the card isn’t right there, it doesn’t exist.
Field reps work in motion. Their day is organized by territory, appointments, delays, and changes on the fly. Your distribution model should match that reality.
The right setup pushes the relevant battle card to the rep at the point of action. If a competitor appears in the account notes, opportunity stage, or appointment prep flow, the card should surface automatically. If the rep loses signal, the card should still be available. If the intel changes, the old version should disappear fast.
That’s the operational difference between “content available somewhere” and “content used in live selling.”
Field-first access should include:
If your current setup can’t do that, your battle cards are still office assets.
Here’s the flow I’d want any outside sales org to run:
A modern mobile app for sales reps matters here because delivery friction kills adoption faster than bad intent ever will.
This is also where media can support the rep if used correctly. A short, customized follow-up can reinforce your position after the meeting, especially when buyers need internal alignment. This breakdown of how SaaS companies use personalized video to create intrigue shows a useful pattern. Don’t replace battle cards with video. Pair them.
For a quick visual on how competitive enablement fits field execution, this clip is worth watching:
“The best battle card in your company is still worthless if the rep can’t reach it during the five minutes that decide the meeting.”
Most reps treat competitive objections like incoming fire. They try to block them. That’s the wrong move.
A good rep redirects. A great rep uses the objection to expose risk in the competitor’s story and move the buyer back onto business reality.
Gong’s guidance is strong on this point. Effective battle cards need fresh, data-backed objection handling for claims around AI and real‑time operations, and reps need hard data and specific landmine questions to challenge those claims. The research process that keeps the card current matters more than the initial format. 1 [https://www.gong.io/blog/sales-battle-card-example](https://www.gong.io/blog/sales-battle-card-example).
That means your rep should not answer “their AI is better” with “ours is better too.” That’s lazy and weak.
Use patterns like these.
Bad response: “We have AI too.”
Use this instead:
“How are they defining that in your evaluation. Is it route suggestions, ETA accuracy, exception handling, or something else?”
Then follow with:
Don’t argue first. Narrow the claim.
Ask:
You're not dodging. You’re making the buyer define value. That’s how inflated claims start collapsing.
Price objections get mishandled because reps panic and start discounting before they’ve diagnosed the gap.
Use a sequence:
Battle cards should give reps language they can use naturally, not robotic scripts. The point is control, not recitation.
A few rules help:
The moment your reps stop trying to “win the argument” and start making buyers inspect the competitor’s story, objections become productive.
A rep walks into a customer site, opens a battle card on their phone, and repeats a competitor claim that stopped being true six weeks ago. Now your rep looks sloppy, your buyer loses trust, and the deal gets harder than it needed to be.
This is what poor maintenance looks like.
Battle cards are only useful if the field trusts them. The minute reps find one bad claim, one old pricing point, or one talk track that falls apart in a live meeting, they stop using the whole program. If your team sells outside the office, that problem gets worse fast. A card buried in a CRM or lost in a wiki will not help a rep standing in a parking lot before the next stop. Keep cards current, and make the latest version available in the field, at the point of action, inside the workflow reps already use.
Pick one owner. Product marketing, competitive intelligence, or sales enablement. Choose one team and make them accountable for accuracy, speed, and distribution. Shared ownership creates slow edits and stale cards.
Use a simple operating rhythm:
The standard is simple. If a rep cannot trust the card in front of a customer, the card is broken.
Leaders love asking whether battle cards increased win rates. Ask that. But start earlier.
First measure whether reps use the cards before live meetings, during route planning, and between stops. For outside sales teams, that means tracking usage where the work happens on mobile, not just assuming a file sitting in a system got read.
These show whether reps are preparing and using the material in the field.
| Metric | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Pre-meeting card opens | Shows whether reps are reviewing competitive guidance before customer conversations |
| Usage by competitor | Reveals which rivals show up often and need sharper coverage |
| Usage by team or region | Exposes coaching gaps, uneven manager inspection, or local competitive pressure |
If you want a stronger measurement framework, use these salesperson KPI examples for field performance to connect rep activity to sales outcomes.
You don’t need a long survey. You need blunt feedback.
Ask reps four questions after contested meetings:
If the form takes more than a minute, completion drops and feedback quality collapses.
These are the business outcomes that matter. Read them with context.
Track:
Do not celebrate output metrics like cards published. Measure whether reps handle competitive deals with more consistency, less discounting, and fewer bad surprises in front of the customer.
The best battle card programs do not update once a quarter after a long internal review. They capture what reps hear on the road and push updates back out fast.
Managers should inspect notes from customer visits. Enablement should revise the card quickly. Reps should get the update where they work, on mobile, before the next meeting. That is the difference between a battle card program that looks organized and one that protects revenue.
Keep the cards sharp. Keep them current. Put them in the rep’s hands when they are about to sell.
If your team sells in the field, your reps need more than static battle cards buried in a CRM. They need route-aware access, live visibility, and a mobile workflow built for real selling. OnRoute helps outside sales teams manage routes, coordinate field activity, and put critical information in front of reps when they need it.
A route-ready battle card is a concise, field-focused guide embedded in a mobile workflow that reps can use in the moment to address competitor claims, with clear next steps and proof points.
Distribute through a mobile-friendly flow that surfaces the right card at the right time—blocked to the account, route stop, or active opportunity. Avoid PDFs in CRM folders; prioritize surface in the rep’s daily workflow.
Track adoption, quality of content, and speed of updates in the field — three signals that your cards are actually used and kept current, which correlates with more consistent selling and fewer discounting surprises.